Model Reference Documentation

Comprehensive baseline assumptions and parameters for the RNG Economic Model

1. Executive Summary

The RNG Economic Model uses industry-standard assumptions and parameters derived from academic research, commercial project data, and regulatory frameworks. All baseline assumptions are calibrated for commercial-scale renewable natural gas projects in North America as of 2025.

Key Model Characteristics:

  • Base Case Project: 280 MMBtu/day (~107,702 GJ/year) RNG production
  • Capital Cost: $12.5M baseline investment
  • Project Lifespan: 25 years operational period
  • Discount Rate: 8% (representative of commercial RNG projects)
  • Currency: All values in 2025 USD
  • Geography: Optimized for Western US markets (California LCFS focus)

Model Coverage:

  • 6 Feedstock Types: Dairy manure, landfill gas, wastewater sludge, agricultural residues, food waste, power-to-gas
  • 3 LCFS Regions: California, Oregon, Washington
  • 2 Add-on Technologies: CNG liquefaction, Power-to-Gas synthesis
  • Government Incentives: Federal tax credits (45Z), LCFS credits, RINs

2. Financial Parameters

Core Financial Assumptions

Project Lifespan25 years
Discount Rate (WACC)8.0%
Base Capital Cost$12.5M
Base Production Capacity280 MMBtu/day
Energy Conversion Factor1.055 GJ/MMBtu
Base Selling Price$15.5/GJ

Financing Structure

Debt Ratio70%
Cost of Debt5.5%
Tax Rate25%
Investment Tax Credit (ITC)30%
Inflation Rate2.5%
Natural Gas Reference Price$3.5/MMBtu

Source: Financial parameters based on commercial RNG project benchmarks, industry reports from EPA AgSTAR, and renewable energy financing standards.

3. Feedstock-Specific Cost Assumptions

Dairy Manure (Default: $3.2/GJ)

Feedstock Cost

$0/wet ton

Often free or negative (tipping fee revenue)

Transport Cost

$8.5/wet ton

Collection and hauling from farms

Processing Cost

$3.2/GJ RNG

Anaerobic digestion, upgrading, O&M

Typical Project Scale: 3,000 cow equivalents | Methane Yield: 16.5 kg CH₄/ton wet weight |Biogas Composition: 50-75% CH₄, 35-45% CO₂

Landfill Gas (Default: $2.8/GJ)

Gas Rights Fee

$0.5/MMBtu

Landfill gas extraction rights

Collection System

$45/SCFM

Gas collection infrastructure

Processing Cost

$2.8/GJ RNG

NMOC/siloxane removal, upgrading

Typical Scale: 600 SCFM collection | Capture Efficiency: 48% |Raw LFG Composition: 40-60% CH₄, 45-50% CO₂, <1% NMOC

Wastewater Sludge (Default: $5.2/GJ)

Sludge Handling

$15/dry ton

Sludge processing and preparation

Pre-treatment

$2.5/m³

Thickening, dewatering operations

Processing Cost

$5.2/GJ RNG

Digestion, H₂S removal, upgrading

Minimum Viable Scale: >17 ML/d flow | Methane Yield: 0.18-0.3 m³ CH₄/kg VS |H₂S Content: 1-2% (requires significant removal)

Agricultural Residues (Default: $6.5/GJ)

Feedstock Cost

$35/dry ton

Corn stover, wheat straw procurement

Collection/Transport

$25/dry ton

Harvest, baling, transport operations

Processing Cost

$6.5/GJ RNG

Pretreatment, gasification, upgrading

US Potential: 111M dry tons/year | Corn Stover Fraction: >75% |Pretreatment: Essential for lignocellulosic breakdown

Food Waste (Default: $4.8/GJ)

Tipping Fee

-$25/wet ton

Revenue from waste disposal service

Preprocessing

$12/wet ton

Sorting, grinding, contaminant removal

Processing Cost

$4.8/GJ RNG

Anaerobic digestion, upgrading

VS Content: 94-98% of total solids | Optimal C/N Ratio: 25-30:1 |Methane Yield: 0.37-0.53 m³ CH₄/kg TS

Power-to-Gas (Default: $12.5/GJ)

Electricity Input

$45/MWh

Renewable electricity for electrolysis

CO₂ Input

$25/tonne

Captured CO₂ for methanation

Processing Cost

$12.5/GJ RNG

Electrolysis, methanation, O&M

Overall Efficiency: 55% electricity-to-methane | Electricity Requirement: 450 kWh/GJ RNG |Carbon Intensity: -950 gCO₂e/MJ (highly negative)

4. Technical Parameters

Biogas Production

Biogas Yield0.25 m³/kg VS
Methane Content60%
Upgrading Efficiency95%
Parasitic Load15%
Capacity Factor90%
System Degradation0.5%/year

Gas Quality Standards

Pipeline Methane Content96-98%
H₂S Content (max)4 ppm
CO₂ Content (max)2%
Water Content (max)112 mg/m³
Injection Pressure1,000 psi
Heating Value950-1,150 Btu/scf

5. Economic Assumptions

LCFS Credit Pricing ($/tCO₂e)

California LCFS$66.25
Oregon CFP$43.05
Washington CFS$22.60

Prices as of Q2 2025. California market has 29.19M credit surplus affecting pricing.

Federal Incentives

RINs (D3 Cellulosic)$21/MMBtu
45Z Production Tax Credit$1.00/gallon equiv
Investment Tax Credit30%
Combined Subsidies$4.2/GJ

Combined value includes federal 45Z credit, LCFS credits, and RINs value.

6. Emissions Factors

Default Project Emissions

Baseline Emissions20,100 tCO₂e/year
Project Emissions4,350 tCO₂e/year
Net Carbon Credits15,750 tCO₂e/year
Methane GWP25
Leakage Factor0%

Feedstock-Specific Emissions

Dairy Manure6.7 tCO₂e/cow/year
Landfill Gas50 kg CH₄/ton MSW
Food Waste37.5 kg CH₄/ton
Power-to-Gas CI-950 gCO₂e/MJ

Source: IPCC emissions factors, EPA AgSTAR guidelines, and CARB CA-GREET model calculations. Methane GWP of 25 used per IPCC AR4 standards (commonly used in LCFS calculations).

10. CNG Liquefaction Parameters

Small Scale (0.5-5 MMBtu/day)

Capital Cost$60,000/MMBtu/day
Energy Consumption350 kWh/MMBtu
Process Efficiency92%
Operating Cost4.5% of capex

Medium Scale (5-50 MMBtu/day)

Capital Cost$45,000/MMBtu/day
Energy Consumption280 kWh/MMBtu
Process Efficiency95%
Operating Cost3.8% of capex

Large Scale (50-500 MMBtu/day)

Capital Cost$32,000/MMBtu/day
Energy Consumption250 kWh/MMBtu
Process Efficiency98%
Operating Cost3.0% of capex

Model Default (280 MMBtu/day facility)

Additional Cost

$2.3/GJ

Electricity Cost

$65/MWh

Process Efficiency

92%

Boil-off Rate

0.15%/day

11. Government Subsidies & Incentives

Federal Programs

45Z Production Tax Credit

$1.00/gallon gasoline equivalent

Clean fuel production credit (2025-2027)

Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS)

D3 RINs: ~$21/MMBtu

Cellulosic biofuel category for RNG

Investment Tax Credit (ITC)

30% of eligible project costs

One-time upfront credit

MACRS Depreciation

5-year accelerated schedule

Modified Accelerated Cost Recovery System

State Programs (West Coast)

California LCFS

$66.25/tCO₂e (current avg)

30% CI reduction target by 2030

Oregon Clean Fuels Program

$43.05/tCO₂e (current avg)

Recently resumed after litigation pause

Washington Clean Fuel Standard

$22.60/tCO₂e (current avg)

20% CI reduction by 2034 (HB 1409)

Combined Model Value

$4.2/GJ total subsidies

When subsidies toggle is enabled

9. Power-to-Gas Parameters

Process Efficiencies

Electrolyzer Efficiency73% (70-75% range)
Methanation Efficiency85% (80-90% range)
Overall P2G Efficiency55% (50-60% range)
Capacity Factor90%

Input Requirements

Electricity450 kWh/GJ RNG
CO₂ Input49.5 kg/GJ RNG
Water Consumption9 m³/tonne H₂
Maintenance Rate4% of capex/year

Cost Structure (10 MW Electrolyzer Example)

Electrolyzer CapEx

$1,200/kW

Methanation System

$800/kW thermal

Total Project Cost

$22M (10 MW)

RNG Production

2,000 GJ/MW/year

12. Calculation Methodologies

Net Present Value (NPV)

NPV = Σ [CFt / (1 + r)^t] - Initial Investment

Where CFt = Cash flow in year t, r = Discount rate (8%), t = Year

Positive NPV

Project creates value

Zero NPV

Break-even project

Negative NPV

Project destroys value

Internal Rate of Return (IRR)

0 = Σ [CFt / (1 + IRR)^t] - Initial Investment

Solved iteratively using Newton-Raphson method with 0.01% tolerance

IRR > 15%

Excellent returns

IRR 8-15%

Acceptable returns

IRR < 8%

Below hurdle rate

Payback Period Calculation

Simple payback period calculated as: Initial Investment / Annual Cash Flow

For uniform cash flows, includes linear interpolation for precise timing.

< 5 years

Fast payback

5-10 years

Moderate payback

> 10 years

Slow payback

Carbon Credit Calculation

Carbon Credits = Baseline Emissions - Project Emissions - Leakage

Uses IPCC methodology with methane GWP of 25 (100-year timeframe, AR4 basis)

Example: 20,100 - 4,350 - 0 = 15,750 tCO₂e/year carbon credits

13. Data Sources & References

Primary Data Sources

EPA AgSTAR Program

Anaerobic digester database, biogas project economics

California Air Resources Board (CARB)

LCFS credit prices, CA-GREET model parameters

US EPA Renewable Fuel Standard

RIN pricing data, D3 cellulosic biofuel credits

Department of Energy (DOE)

Hydrogen production costs, P2G technology assessments

IPCC Guidelines

Emissions factors, methane GWP values

Industry & Academic Sources

American Biogas Association

Industry benchmarks, project development costs

National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL)

Technology cost databases, renewable energy analysis

International Energy Agency (IEA)

Global hydrogen outlook, P2G technology roadmaps

GTI Energy

Gas technology benchmarks, RNG market analysis

Academic Literature

Peer-reviewed studies on biogas yields, processing costs

Data Validation Approach

All baseline assumptions have been cross-referenced across multiple sources and validated against commercial project data where available. Default values represent industry medians or typical ranges for commercial-scale projects. Regional variations and technology-specific adjustments are incorporated through the Advanced Parameters interface.

Model Limitations & Disclaimers

Important Disclaimers

  • • This model provides preliminary economic analysis for planning purposes only
  • • Actual project economics may vary significantly based on site-specific conditions
  • • Policy incentives are subject to change and may expire or be modified
  • • Capital costs can vary ±50% based on project complexity and location
  • • Feedstock availability and pricing are site and region-specific

Model Simplifications

  • • Assumes uniform annual cash flows (no seasonality or market volatility)
  • • Does not account for construction period financing or delays
  • • Simplified O&M cost structure (actual costs may have different components)
  • • No consideration of interconnection or pipeline transportation costs
  • • Carbon intensity calculations use simplified lifecycle assessment

Recommended Next Steps

  • • Conduct detailed site-specific feasibility studies
  • • Obtain actual quotes for equipment and EPC costs
  • • Validate feedstock availability and pricing with local sources
  • • Confirm current policy incentive values and eligibility
  • • Perform sensitivity analysis on key variables

RNG Economic Model Reference Documentation

Generated on September 1, 2025 | Version 1.0

For technical support or questions about these assumptions, please consult the model documentation or contact your technical advisor.